After a person has been read the implied consent notice, been  tested, or refused the test, the police officer will keep his or her plastic driver's license. He must serve the person with a pink form that has been properly filled out by the officer. This form, called a DC-27, will serve as the person's driver's license during the pendency of the administrative suit.

On the pink form, in the fine print, are instructions informing drivers that they must make a written request for a hearing concerning their driving privileges within 10 days If the driver fails to make a written request within the 10 day limit, or doesn=t make the request properly, his license will be automatically suspended by the Department of Revenue. If the driver, or his attorney, does request a hearing, the driver will be given what is called an Administrative Hearing.

American Due Process provides that before the government can take away your property, you must be given an administrative hearing to determine whether that taking is lawful. Sending in the pink slip of paper on the bottom of the DC-27 is a request for an administrative hearing. When the Department of Revenue receives this request, they will send notice to the driver and/or his attorney that they have received it. The driver=s privileges will be extended until the date of the hearing. About three to six weeks after the request is mailed in, the driver and/or his attorney will receive notice of the hearing date and time. The hearing date is chosen by the Department and cannot be changed, moved or continued. The Department will also subpoena the arresting officer to be present for the hearing if you request that it do so.

The Department of Revenue will issue an order requiring that any video or audio tapes be provided by the police to the driver prior to the hearing. They will also mail the driver or his attorney certain documents which are important for the hearing. Our firm also frequently files motions at these hearings, and usually files a list of objections to the proceedings with the hearing officer/judge.

It is important that discovery be obtained through the criminal case prior to the hearing so that your attorney is prepared with all of the police reports, videotapes, audiotapes, documents concerning the breath testing machinery and its maintenance, the officer=s field sobriety training manuals, and other documentation so that you get a full and fair hearing and the officer can be properly cross-examined.

IF YOU TOOK THE TEST: At the administrative hearing of a driver who took and failed a test, the driver has the burden to prove (1) that the officer did not have reasonable grounds to believe that the person was operating a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and/or drugs; or (2) that they were not arrested or were improperly arrested; or (3) that they were not given the implied consent notice; or (4) that the testing procedure was done incorrectly. Those are the only issues at the hearing and if you can't prove it, you lose your license.

IF YOU REFUSED THE TEST: At the administrative hearing of a person who refused a test, the driver has the burden to prove (1) that the officer did not have reasonable grounds to believe that the person was operating a vehicle while under the influence; or (2) that they were not arrested or were improperly arrested; or (3) they were not given the implied consent notice; or (4) that they did not refuse the test. Those are the only issues at the hearing and if you can't prove it, you lose your license.

IF YOU WERE IN A TRAFFIC ACCIDENT: At the administrative hearing of a person involved in a traffic accident, no matter how minimal the damage was to persons or property, the issues are the same except that if there is any indication that alcohol was involved (even if the driver had a teaspoon of beer), the only issue is whether the implied consent notice was given and whether the test was done properly.

IF YOU WERE UNDER 21 YEARS OF AGE AND TOOK THE TEST: Any person under the age of 21 who operates a motor vehicle with an alcohol concentration of .02 or greater is subject to having his or her driving privileges suspended. The issues at the hearing are the same as those for the over-21's that took the test. If the underage person tested between .02 and .08 the suspension period is 30 days followed by 330 days of restrictions on the first occurrence and a one year suspension on the second. If the underage person tests at a .08 or greater, the suspension period is one year.

OTHER ISSUES OR DEFENSES: Administrative hearings are tough to win because the driver has the burden of proving that he wasn't DUI, whereas in a criminal case it is the prosecutor's burden to prove all elements of a DUI beyond a reasonable doubt. The easiest way to win is if the officer fails to appear. If the police officer doesn't show up to the hearing - case dismissed. Whether a person was even driving may be a defense. Whether a person drank alcohol after driving may be a good defense. There are a multitude of technical statutory or constitutional arguments and defenses. There are also medical defenses (diabetics may often appear intoxicated during a period of insulin deficiency; asthmatics may have a hard time blowing into an Intoxilyzer 5000). The list of defenses is only limited to the work and creativity that you and your attorney put into developing a defense for the administrative hearing.